Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., Kmart Corporation, Aquawood, L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
Manley Toy Direct L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Aviva Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Jeanette Jaime v. SHC Desert Springs, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00030
Defendant:
Does, KMart Corporation and SHC Desert Springs, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Jaime
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al
as 2:2017cv07151
Defendant:
DOES, KMart Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Paul Benavidez v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv06226
Plaintiff:
Paul Benavidez
Defendant:
Does, Home Products International-North America Inc and Kmart Corporation
Fabric Selection, Inc. v. One Step Up, Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv06153
Defendant:
10 Below, LLC, Beall's Outlet Stores, Inc., Beall's, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Fabric Selection, Inc.
Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03672
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. and KMart Corporation
Defendant:
A&T Battery Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, NEC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00665
Defendant:
ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
AVIVA SPORTS, INC. v. FINGERHUT DIRECT MARKETING, INC. et al
as 2:2016mc00029
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., KMART CORPORATION, MANLEY TOYS, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
AVIVA SPORTS, INC.
Kmart Corporation v. NLRB
as 15-60897
Petitioner:
KMART CORPORATION, a subsidiary of SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
