Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Joseph et al v. Fluor Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jean Joseph, Vernadine Mabry and Bernard Mabry, III
Defendant:
Fluor Corporation, Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. and Maytag Corporation
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. et al v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01869
Plaintiff:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS MONTERREY MEXICO, S.A., DE, CV
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, WHIRLPOOL PATENTS COMPANY, WHIRLPOOL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Maytag Corporation
as 4:2007mc00025
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Maytag Corporation
United States of America v. Dixie Narco Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01925
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dixie Narco Inc, Maytag Corporation and Rheem Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Hazardous Substances Releases, Liability - Definition
MAYTAG V ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS
as 07-1015
Defendant-Appellee:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Maytag Corporation
DIVERSIFIED SPECIALT V MAYTAG CORP
as 05-1364
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Diversified Specialties, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
MAYTAG CORPORATION
IMONEX SERVICES V W H MUNZPRUFER
as 04-1262
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS, L.L.C., AMERICAN DRYER, INC., MAYTAG CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
IMONEX SERVICES, INC.
GENERAL REFRACTORIES v. STONE CONTAINER, et al
as 2:1999cv01341
Plaintiff:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY
Defendant:
STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION
Respondent:
PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA , MAYTAG CORPORATION , LANGER & GROGAN, P.C. and others
Movant:
CREST MEAT CO., INC. , FARMLAND FOODS, INC. , USG CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
