Cases 11 - 20 of 545
Merrill Lynch v. Palombo
as 22-20571
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
John Michael Palombo
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Noah Eisenberg v. Bank of America Corporation et al.
as 8:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
NOAH EISENBERG, an individual and Noah Eisenberg
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national association, BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Burns v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Inc., et al
as 2:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Laura Burns
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00053
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00049
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent:
Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner:
The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv04118
Petitioner:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Respondent:
John Michael Palombo
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
