Cases 11 - 20 of 736
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
de Lacour v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
as 24-331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNE DE LACOUR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ANDREA WRIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and LOREE MORAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO. and TOM'S OF MAINE INC.
ESTATE OF AVRAHAM SASI et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF AVRAHAM SASI, TERRI PETERSON, TRUDI DAUB and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
MORAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00117
Petitioner:
JUDITH MORAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Moran et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
CJ Moran and GIE MORAN
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU, MERRICK B GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
McAuliffe v. Mobileye Global Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
John McAuliffe
Defendant:
Mobileye Global Inc., Amnon Shashua, Moran Shemesh Rojansky and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Moran v. Austin et al
as 1:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Moran
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Michelle Howard, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moran-Bravo v. Garland
as 23-7429
Petitioner:
JAVIER MORAN-BRAVO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Moran-Stenson
as 23-1842
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAIQUAN MORAN-STENSON, a/k/a Shaiquan Moran-Stetson, a/k/a Fabio, a/k/a Q
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
