Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Higgins et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as ILN/1:13-cv-04291
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Higgins and Ursula Newtown-Higgins
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. O'BRIEN et al
as 2:2011cv05081
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY , ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, III., BEAR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, BRISTOL FAMILY PRACTICE & MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
J.G. v. Newtown-Harris R-III School District et al
as 5:2011cv06060
Defendant:
Newtown-Harris R-III School District, Patrick Boyle , Missouri State Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
J.G.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
In re: Publication Paper
as 11-101
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Gardella, Jr., o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as FCP Webindery Inc., Technolith Inc, o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as FCP Webindery Inc., Larry Weiss, o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as Forms Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Acorn/Parliament Paper Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated, Digital Color Imaging, Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated and Austin Printing Co. Inc., individually and o/b/o all others similarly situated
Defendant:
International Paper Co., Meadwestvaco Corp., Norske Skogindustrier ASA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Stora Enso Oyj and Stora Enso North America Corp.
In Re: Publication Paper
as 11-101
Plaintiff:
Chris Young, Thomas Muldoon, Indirect Purchaser Plaintiff, Donna McCann, o/b/o herself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Bowater, Inc., Metsalitto Group, Norske Skog (USA) Holdings Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Stora Enso North America Corp. and Stora Enso Oyj
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Digital Color Imaging, Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated, Austin Printing Co. Inc., individually and o/b/o all others similarly situated and Acorn/Parliament Paper Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated
SEC v. Davis' Homesteads at Newtown,, et al
as 10-36187
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor - Appellant:
DAVIS' HOMESTEADS AT NEWTON, LLC, FREEMAN'S HOMESTEADS AT NEWTOWN, LLC, GEISTLINGER'S HOMESTEADS AT NEWTOWN, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUNWEST MANAGEMENT, INC., CANYON CREEK DEVELOPMENT, INC., CANYON CREEK FINANCIAL, LLC and others
NEWTOWN et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as PAE/2:10-CV-61721
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC
Plaintiff:
NEWTOWN
Mark McNeely v. Newtown Energy Incorporated
as 09-2286
Petitioner:
MARK MCNEELY
Respondent:
NEWTOWN ENERGY INCORPORATED, BRICKSTREET MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sunwest Management, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv06056
Intervenor:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Vestin Realty Mortgage II, Inc., Connolly Intervenors and others
Amicus Curiae:
Hawley's Sequim, LLC, Walter Stawinski, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and others
Claimant:
Lloyd Enterprises, Inc., Scott C. Nielsen, Smart Park 3 TIC Investors and others
Interested Party:
Grove, Mueller & Swank, P.C., Mountain View ALF Investors, LLC, Thomas F. Biesiadecki and others
Defendant:
J. Wallace Gutzler, Sunwest Management, Inc., Clyde Hamstreet and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Milton Obote, Secured TICs and others
Interpleader:
Zions First National Bank
Receiver:
Michael Grassmueck and Maggie Lyons
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor Defendant:
Harry Geistlinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RAFAEL N.
as 2:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT, MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT and MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
RAFAEL N. and RAFAEL N.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
