Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Bey v. Valair, et al
as 20-1465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAFARI BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
NIKOS RETZOS, Badge # 4387, STEVE VALAIR, Badge# 3730, MARK BARTHOLOMEW and others
US v. Rushaun Parker
as 20-6220
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSHAUN NECKO PARKER, a/k/a Duke, a/k/a Rushuan Nekoe Parker, a/k/a Rushuan Nikoe Parker
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re Pareteum Securities Litigation
as 1:2019cv09767
Defendant:
Victor Bozzo, Pareteum Corporation, Denis McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Brien, Marco Scaccia, Tri Doan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gateway Securities LLC
Cross Claimant:
Dawson James Securities, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Robert H. Turner
Interested Party:
Anthony M. Saccullo, as Liquidation Trustee for the TEUM Liquidating Trust
Nikos Kidis v. Jean Reid, et al
as 19-1673
Defendant / Appellant:
JEAN REID and JOHN MORAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NIKOS KIDIS
United States v. Davis
as 19-6023
Defendant / Appellant:
NIKO DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Parkins
as 18-1019
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Nikos Parkins
Lloyd I. Miller Trust A-4 v. W2007 Grace Acquisition I, INC
as 17-3314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Marcus, As trustee of the grace preferred litigation trust, Lloyd I. Miller Trust A-4, Milfam II L.P. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel E. Smith, W2007 Grace Acquisition I, INC., PFD Holdings, LLC and others
HECHT v. ZOIS
as 3:2017cv02563
Petitioner:
NIKOS HECHT
Respondent:
CHRIST L. ZOIS
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
In re: Niko Thompson
as 17-11680
Petitioner:
In re: NIKO THOMPSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Parkin
as 17-607
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Nikos Parkins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
