Cases 11 - 20 of 27
In re: Anton Watson
as 14-10761
Petitioner:
In re: ANTON R. WATSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-21225
Plaintiff:
Madonna Watson and David R Watson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Watson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-21021
Plaintiff:
Helen R. Watson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Dantis et al
as 1:2011cv03219
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Josefina P Dantis, Charles R. Watson and United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. JB&L Entertainment LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
JB&L Entertainment LLC, Walter Lee Watson, Jobeth B Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Pardini v. Schriro, et. al
as 2:2008cv01509
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Pardini
Defendant:
Dora Schriro , Unknown Villalobos and R. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis R. Watson v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78128
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Watson
USA v. William Foster
as 09-50404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY FOSTER, III, also known as William H. Foster, also known as William Henry Foster and ADAM RICHARD WATSON, also known as Adam R. Watson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
