Cases 11 - 20 of 1,981
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Romero-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-2655
Petitioner:
MARIA ROMERO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20758
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Telematica Lefic, S.A. De C.V. et al v. Socorro Marin, et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Telemtica Lefic, S.A. De C.V., Dyntra, S.A. De C.V., Rosa Maria Romero Vargas and others
Defendant:
Antonio J. Socorro Marin and Iquantics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Romero-Vasquez v. Garland
as 24-2600
Petitioner:
FAUSTINO ROMERO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Xiquin Xirum, et al v. Garland
as 24-1413
Petitioner:
JACINTO XIQUIN XIRUM and BARTOLA ROMERO SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Barrales v. Garland
as 24-9529
Petitioner:
CASIMIRO ROMERO BARRALES
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romero-Lemus v. Garland
as 24-1046
Petitioner:
BRYAN STEVEN ROMERO-LEMUS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
