Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. et al v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01106
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant: KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. et al v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01106
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant: KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC.
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDING INC. et al v. NATIONAL MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00070
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDING INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: NATIONAL MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION, COOPERATIVES WORKING TOGETHER, DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07003
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05480
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: WYETH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00199
Plaintiff: Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. and Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant: Wyeth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. et al v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv10344
Plaintiff: Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. and Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant: Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. Unimed Pharmeceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02913
Plaintiff: Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc., Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc., Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?