Cases 11 - 20 of 1,469
Concerned Citizens of St. John, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1251
Petitioner:
Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics and others
Respondent:
Michael S. Regan and Environmental Protection Agency
San Carlos Apache Tribe, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1241
Respondent:
Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
San Carlos Apache Tribe and Sierra Club
General Land Office v. Kinder
as 24-40447
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Texas, Dawn Buckingham, Commissioner, Medical Doctor and others
Movant:
Posillico Civil, Incorporated, Coastal Environmental Group, Incorporated, doing business as Southern Border Constructors, Southern Border Communities Coalition, Texas Sterling Construction Company and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, The Kettle Range Conservation Group, Nimiipuu Protecting the Environment and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Interior, Martha Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor:
Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Amicus Curiae:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Clean Water Action, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-2246
Petitioner:
Clean Water Action, Environmental Integrity Project, Sierra Club and others
Respondent:
Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Water Action, et al. v. EPA, et al.
as DC/1:24-ca-01167
Petitioner:
Clean Water Action, Environmental Integrity Project, Sierra Club and others
Respondent:
Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5159
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Plaintiff:
Miami Waterkeeper, Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, John Forbes Blevins, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator for Region 4 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Greenbrier River Watershed Association, Kanawha Forest Coalition and others
Defendant:
Jason Hattersley, United States Forest Service and Randy Moore
Intervenor:
South Fork Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Clean Air Council, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1177
Petitioner:
Clean Air Council, Gary Advocates for Responsible Development, Hoosier Environmental Council and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
California Communities Against Toxics, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1178
Petitioner:
California Communities Against Toxics, Clean Power Lake County, Comite Dialogo Ambiental and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
