Cases 11 - 20 of 27
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07979
Defendant:
Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. , Perrigo Company PLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner:
James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv12732
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , Novartis Corporation and Novartis AG
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al
as 2:2004cv05898
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, MC - UA LOCAL 119 HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Petitioner:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00481
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and G.D. Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Sidney Hillman Health Center o, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Incorpora, et al
as 14-2282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY HILLMAN HEALTH CENTER OF ROCHESTER, TEAMSTERS HEALTH SERVICES AND INSURANCE PLAN LOCAL 404 and UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED and ABBVIE, INCORPORATED
Sidney Hillman Health Center of Rochester et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2013cv05865
Plaintiff:
Sidney Hillman Health Center of Rochester , Teamsters Health Services and Insurance Plan Local 404 and United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Astrazeneca AB et al
as 1:2012cv12203
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
Defendant:
Astrazeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, AstraZeneca, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Ins, et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Health Net, Inc., et al v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 12-15585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEALTH NET, INC., UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
