Cases 11 - 20 of 4,248
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Key v. McDonough
as 24-1736
Claimant:
WILLIE A. KEY
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Willis v. United States of America
as 24-2548
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL WILLIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Wilfredo Barrios
as 24-1662
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILFREDO BARRIOS, also known as Willie
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Willie Moody, Jr., et al v. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc., et al
as 24-90004
Petitioner:
WILLIE MOODY, JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JESSICA HARPER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DALLAS WELDON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC., a foreign corporation and CIRCLE K STORES, INC., a foreign corporation
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Richard v. Fischer
as 24-793
Defendant:
Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIS RICHARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
