Cases 21 - 30 of 2,135
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fields v. Foss, et al.
as 24-2377
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE SHAWN DUPREE FIELDS
Defendant:
C. CALDERON, S. ALVAREZ, D. MAGANA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant:
V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Genovevo Alvarez Ronquillo v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1324
Petitioner:
GENOVEVO ALVAREZ RONQUILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Gonzalez Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-2329
Petitioner:
JOSE ROLANDO GONZALEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo-Pizarro v. Garland
as 24-933
Petitioner:
BLANCA REBECA CASTILLO-PIZARRO, ALISON DANIELA ALVAREZ-CASTILLO and EVELYN JAZMIN ALVAREZ-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Alvarez v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Adriana Mancera Alvarez
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanchez la Torre, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2106
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ LA TORRE, YAQUELINE KRISTIMEN LIZA ALVAREZ, SABRINA AKIRA YACKELIN SANCHEZ LIZA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
