Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Doe et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv01743
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Latino Network, Brenda Villarruel, Jane Doe #3 and others
Amicus Curiae:
Centro Latino Americano, Oregon Interfaith Movement for Immigrant Justice, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Melissa Buck, et al v. Robert Gordon, et al
as 19-2185
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MELISSA BUCK, CHAD BUCK, ST. VINCENT CATHOLIC CHARITIES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, JOO YEUN CHANG, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Michigan Children's Services Agency, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Michigan and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Not Yet Classified:
DANA DUMONT and KRISTY DUMONT
Make the Road New York et al v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2019cv07993
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Make the Road New York and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Public Health Association, Congressional Tri-Caucus, American Academy of Nursing and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Asian Americans Advancing Justice/Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund/National Women's Law Center, Economic Progress Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MULANGU et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2019cv02682
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mulangu, Nyankoye Dramou and CATHOLIC CHARITIES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Melissa Buck, et al v. Robert Gordon, et al
as 19-1959
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MELISSA BUCK, CHAD BUCK, ST. VINCENT CATHOLIC CHARITIES and others
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Michigan, ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and others
Not Yet Classified:
DANA DUMONT and KRISTY DUMONT
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae:
LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Immigrant Defenders Law Center et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al
as 2:2019cv02058
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Western State College of Law Immigration Clinic, Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Esperanza Immigrant Rights Project at Catholic Charities and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kaps Kapende, et al v. DHS
as 19-5080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Catholic Charities, Annie Kaseka and Kaps Kapende
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security
KAPENDE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2018cv01238
Plaintiff:
KAPS KAPENDE , ANNIE KASEKA and CATHOLIC CHARITIES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
KHINE, et al. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2017cv01924
Plaintiff:
CATHOLIC CHARITIES and KAY KHINE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
