Cases 21 - 30 of 307
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1009
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Oklahoma, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Utah v. Su
as 23-11097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2023cv06364
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet
Defendant:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company FC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. EPA, et al
as 23-1315
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Enivronmental Protection Agency
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment C v. EPA, et al
as 23-1314
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff:
Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader:
State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party:
The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
