Cases 21 - 30 of 353
Bacher, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 23-141
Petitioner:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Respondent:
Mary Cassidy
Bacher, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 23-143
Petitioner:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Respondent:
John Corwin
Bacher, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 23-147
Petitioner:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Respondent:
Rafael Rolon
Bacher, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 23-150
Petitioner:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Respondent:
Thomas Vazzano
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bacher, et al,, et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al,, et al
as 23-139
Petitioner:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Respondent:
Beth Bacher, Representative for Paul Bacher (Deceased)
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. The United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv03445
Defendant:
Alpha Assembly Solutions, Inc., Ashland Inc., INEOS US Chemicals Company and others
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Hazardous Substances Releases, Liability - Definition
Dale v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 4:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Elliot Conrad Dale
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
James Martin v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., et al
as 21-11097
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CHATTEM INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
