Cases 21 - 30 of 405
NAPRSTEK v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11442
Defendant:
GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, DT HOLDINGS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUBOS NAPRSTEK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Victoria Giampa v. Midfirst Bank, et al
as 17-17438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA GIAMPA
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, FANNIE MAE, FANNIE MAE AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST and others
Battaile v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 5:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bre-Anna Battaile
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tracy Foster, et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 17-90025
Petitioner:
TRACY FOSTER and CORNELL FOSTER
Respondent:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
Battaile v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 3:2017cv00707
Plaintiff:
Bre-Anna Battaile
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Mark Fam v. Bank of America (USA)
as 17-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK FAM
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, a/k/a Ditech Financial LLC and DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, DANIEL WHITEHEAD and ROSENBERG LAW FIRM
Sandoval v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 5:2017cv05753
Plaintiff:
Claudia Sandoval
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Ditech Financial LLC (fka Green Tree Servicing, LLC)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 17-306
Petitioner:
In re: GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
Respondent:
BRIAN GEARY and CONNIE GEARY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3696
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
