Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Debra J. Johnson-Champ et al v. Northstar Moving Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv04829
Plaintiff:
Michael W Champ and Debra S. Johnson-Champ
Defendant:
Anthony Doe, David Doe, James Doe and others
Doe et al v. USA et al
as 3:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
James Doe and Susan Doe
Defendant:
USA , United States Department of Defense , Ashton B. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. United States of America
as 1:2014mi00002
Plaintiff:
James Doe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BOE et al v. EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv01721
Plaintiff:
BOB BOE , MARY MOE , JANE DOE and others
Defendant:
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA , EASTERN DISTRICT ASSOCIATION OF THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA, INC. , THE CHRISTIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thompson v. Upstate Debt Management Inc
as 1:2012cv00151
Defendant:
Upstate Debt Management Inc, James Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Melissa J Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Jindal et al
as 3:2011cv00554
Defendant:
Trent Brignac, James D. Caldwell, Jr., John Phillip Haney and others
Plaintiff:
James Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv04699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tikkun v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2005cv09901
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Tikkun
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Bloomberg , Raymond Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
