Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Hanley v. City of Houston
as 22-20462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hampton Ronald Hanley
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston, Harris County Appraisal District, Federal Emergency Management Agency and others
Gamada Hussein v. President Joe Biden, et al
as 22-2877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
President Joe Biden and John Does
Anguiano v. United States Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Alberto Anguiano
Defendant:
United States Inc., President of the United States of America, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Zelesnik v. McConnell et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Mitch McConnell, Senator Rob Portman, Steve Chabot and others
Zelesnik v. McConnell et al
as 2:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Mitch McConnell, President Joe Biden, The Ohio State and others
Carroll v. Biden
as 3:2022cv05368
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Carroll
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
William Carol Clarke vs. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al.
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Communications Commission, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zelesnik v. McConnell et al
as 2:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Mitch McConnell, President Joe Biden, V.P. Kamala Harris and others
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
