Cases 21 - 30 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Keeling v. Shannon
as 22-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. KEELING and Vincent Owens
Respondent:
ROBERT SHANNON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scott Burnett, et al v. HomeServices of America, Inc., et al
as 22-2664
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scott Burnett, Ryan Hendrickson, Jerod Breit and others
Plaintiff:
Frances Harvey, Hollee Ellis and Shelly Dreyer
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, Keller Williams Realty, Inc., Realogy Holdings Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HomeServices of America, BHH Affiliates, LLC and HSF Affiliates, LLC
Scott Burnett, et al v. National Assoc. of Realtors, et al
as 22-8009
Respondent:
Scott Burnett, Rhonda Burnett, Ryan Hendrickson and others
Petitioner:
National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Keller Williams Realty, Inc. and others
Keel v. McDonough
as 22-1565
Claimant:
DAVID O. KEEL
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Keel v. Casper Sleep Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10546
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keel
Defendant:
Casper Sleep Inc., Philip Krim, Anthony Florence and others
USA v. Roger Keeling
as 21-30259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER KEELING, AKA Roger Vance Keeling
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King Grant-Davis v. Alan Wilson
as 21-2157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING GRANT-DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General, MARK KEEL, Chief of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
