Cases 21 - 30 of 44
United States v. Abraham Lamin
as 15-3429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Abraham Maada Lamin
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission v. Uber, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission
Defendant:
Uber, Inc. , Uber Technologies, Inc. , John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mamadou Toure, et al v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-3532
Petitioner:
MAMADOU LAMINE TOURE and YOUMA DIALLO
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Lamin Daniel
as 15-10133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMIN LAMAR DANIELS, also known as Lamont Robinson
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06695
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Thermo Pressed Laminates, LLC v. Arclin USA, LLC, et al
as 13-36032
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THERMO PRESSED LAMINATES, LLC, an Oregon corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
ARCLIN USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and ARCLIN SURFACES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Thermo Pressed Laminates, LLC v. Arclin USA LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01330
Defendant:
Arclin Surfaces, LLC and Arclin USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Thermo Pressed Laminates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Lamine Fall v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-4459
Petitioner:
LAMINE FALL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Formiline Industria De Laminados Ltda. v. Multisource Laminates, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc91178
Plaintiff:
Formiline Industria De Laminados Ltda.
Defendant:
Multisource Laminates, Inc. and Lawrence Brophy
Lamin Manjang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71690
Petitioner:
LAMIN MANJANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
