Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
North Dakota, State of et al v. Burwell et al
as 3:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
North Dakota, State of , Religious Sisters of Mercy, The , Sacred Heart Mercy Health Care and others
Defendant:
Sylvia Burwell and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Movant:
American Civil Liberties Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Raymond, et al v. Avectus Healthcare Solutions,, et al
as 16-4172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RAYMOND and TIMOTHY STRUNK, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AVECTUS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, aka Medpay Assuance, LLC and MERCY HEALTH
Sanzone et al v. Mercy Health et al
as OKW/5:16-cv-00478
Plaintiff:
Sally Sanzone
Defendant:
Mercy Health , Mercy Health Benefits Committee , John Does and others
Grasle v. Mercy Health et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-00651
Plaintiff:
Gene Grasle
Defendant:
Mercy Health , Mercy Health Benefits Committee and John Does 1-20
Mercy Health et al v. CareLogistics, LLC
as 1:2016cv00208
Petitioner:
Mercy Health and Mercy Health North LLC
Respondent:
CareLogistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09
Raymond et al v. Avectus Healthcare Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
Keith Raymond and Timothy Strunk
Defendant:
Avectus Healthcare Solutions, LLC and Mercy Health
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Petri v. Mercy Health
as 4:2015cv01296
Plaintiff:
Joseph Petri
Defendant:
Mercy Health
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
