Cases 21 - 30 of 784
Lena Lindberg v. Bruce Assam, et al
as 23-7137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lena Marie Lindberg
Defendant / Appellee:
Bruce Lee Assam, Vincent Albert Citro, Edward Melvin Fitzgerald and others
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In re: Tibbs v. Electrocore, Inc, et al
as 23-2655
Petitioner / Appellant:
In re: CAROLE TIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELECTROCORE INC, FRANCIS R. AMATO, GLENN S. VRANIAK and others
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Lori Patitz, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-12440
Petitioner / Appellant:
LORI MICHELLE PATITZ and ANDREW ROBERT MOODY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Gold v. US Bancorp et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
The Farmworker Association of Florida, Inc. et al v. DeSantis et al
as 1:2023cv22655
Plaintiff:
The Farmworker Association of Florida, Inc., A. M., J. L. and others
Defendant:
Ronald D. DeSantis, Ashley Moody, Nicholas B. Cox and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Immigration Lawyers Association and Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
