Cases 21 - 30 of 417
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 21-13177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Official and Individual Capacities, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, Official and Individual Capacities, BO STOREY, Official and Individual Capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bartlett v. Societe Generale de Banque au
as 21-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Munns
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Bartlett, Terrel Charles Bartlett, Linda Jones and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dr. Muhammad Baasiri
Defendant / Appellant:
Jammal Trust Bank SAL
Defendant:
Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL, John Does 1-50, Fenicia Bank and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States Department of State
Petitioner:
Professor Joseph W. Dellapenna
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv15229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pruitt v. Asphalt Zipper
as 21-50717
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Chuck Pruitt
Defendant / Appellant:
Asphalt Zipper, Incorporated
BRAVE v. U.S. CONCRETE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv14386
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRAVE
Defendant:
U.S. CONCRETE, INC., MICHAEL D. LUNDIN, SUSAN M. BALL and others
Beauregard v. U.S. Concrete, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06489
Plaintiff:
Claude Beauregard
Defendant:
U.S. Concrete, Inc., Michael D. Lundin, Susan M. Ball and others
Wilhelm v. U.S. Concrete, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
U.S. Concrete, Inc., Michael D. Lundin, Susan M. Ball and others
KENT v. U.S. CONCRETE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv14199
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENT
Defendant:
U.S. CONCRETE, INC., MICHAEL D. LUNDIN, SUSAN M. BALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
