Cases 21 - 30 of 1,916
Dixon v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
USA v. Tyron McFadden
as 24-1138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRON MCFADDEN, a/k/a KEV, a/k/a RON, a/k/a TRO
US v. Ron Elfenbein
as 24-4048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
RON K. ELFENBEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Travers v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Travers
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., Tony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAFNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ASHLEY MOODY and RON DESANTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
Jackson, et al. v. Allison, et al.
as 23-4271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON, LAMAVIS A. COMUNDOIWILLA and ROY L. BROWN
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, RALPH DIAZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
