Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Deem v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-18713
Plaintiff:
Dottie J. Deem
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Deem v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-17657
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Barry Lee Deem
Matthew Woods v. Theodore Craver, et al
as 14-55827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW WOODS, Private Citizen, Educator, Consumer Advocate, Freelance Investigative Journalist, Racketeering Investigator, Commercial Artist, American Citizen
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE F. CRAVER, SCE CEO and as CEO of Edison International and as a Board Member of Health-Net Inc., PETER BRIERTY, Arrowhead United Way CEO and as individual, BRIAN HEADLEY, a public arson investigator as individual and others
USA v. Steven Deem
as 14-30169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN DEEM
Anstine & Musgrove, Inc. et al v. Iberia Management Systems, Inc.
as 4:2012mc00630
Petitioner:
Anstine & Musgrove, Inc. , Arrow Oil & Gas, Inc. , Beasley Oil Company and others
Respondent:
Iberia Management Systems, Inc.
Ronald Huber, et al v. Robert G. Taylor II, et al
as 11-8084
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
RONALD L. HUBER, WILLIAM J. AIRGOOD, ANTHONY DEFABBO and others
Defendant - Respondent:
ROBERT G. TAYLOR II, PRITCHARD LAW FIRM, COX AND COX LLP and others
James Smith v. L. Carmichael et al
as 2:2011cv06224
Defendant:
L. Carmichael, A. Deems, K. Dhillon and others
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Deem v. Ames True Temper, Inc.
as 6:2010cv01339
Plaintiff:
Harry F. Deem
Defendant:
Ames True Temper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Larry Deems v. Commr. of IRS
as 10-13378
Petitioner:
LARRY DEEMS
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF IRS
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
