Cases 31 - 40 of 892
PCI Intermediate, Inc. v. John S. Horton et al
as 5:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
PCI Intermediate, Inc.
Defendant:
John S Horton and Robert Eng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Lee v. D.R. Horton
as 23-30416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lindsey Lee, Wayne Ballard, Jr., Jennifer Ballard and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D.R. Horton, Incorporated, D.R. Horton, Incorporated - Gulf Coast, Acadian Trace HOA, Incorporated and others
Morales et al v. Forte Data Systems, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00208
Respondent:
Forte Data Systems, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Richard Horton
as 23-2426
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Patrick Horton
Horton et al v. Heppner et al
as 3:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
Thomas Horton and Frank Moore
Defendant:
Brad K Heppner, Peter T Cangany, Jr, Thomas O Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Ricky-Dean Horton v. PG&E Corporation
as 23-15716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY-DEAN HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PG&E CORPORATION
Stanny Ray Hudgins et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:23-CV-01747
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORPORATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Stanny Ray Hudgins, Philip Wendell Gould, Frank Joseph Micalizzi and others
Scura et al v. Heppner et al
as 3:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
David Scura and Clifford Day
Defendant:
Brad K. Heppner, Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes and others
Petitioner:
Xiaoling Xu, Thomas Horton, Frank Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Horton v. SunPath Ltd
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
SunPath Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
