Cases 31 - 40 of 29,087
US v. Anthony Andrews
as 24-6513
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat
US v. Michael Morgan
as 24-6510
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. MORGAN, a/k/a Steve
Harris v. Muhammad, et al.
as 24-3307
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS
Defendant:
CLERIC MUHAMMAD, AKA: K. Fasish, JACKSON, SQSP Christian Chaplain and CHARLES RICHEY, Chaplain, Community Resources Manager of the CDCRs Division of Adult Institutions Religious Programs Oversight Unit
Kedzie Boulevard Cafe, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Kedzie Boulevard Cafe, Inc. doing business as Scofflaw
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pasha v. New York State Department of Health
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
TALHA S. PASHA
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Corning Tower-Empire State Plaza, THE EXECUSEARCH GROUP, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION and others
Apple Inc. v. Vidal
as 24-1864
Plaintiff:
APPLE INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GOOGLE LLC and others
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
US v. Robert Strother
as 24-4291
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEE STROTHER, a/k/a Ratchet
US v. Benjamin Gibbs
as 24-6496
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, a/k/a Hev, a/k/a Bubba
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
