Cases 31 - 40 of 1,041
James Sims v. QG Printing II LLC
as 23-80028
Respondent:
JAMES SIMS, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
QG PRINTING II LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company
Evans et al v. NexTech AR Solutions Corp.
as 1:2023mc01004
Plaintiff:
Jim Evans and Dave Franklin
Defendant:
NexTech AR Solutions Corp.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Justin McAusland, Derek Sims and Peter J. Woolverton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. McKnight et al
as 3:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission, US and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Aaron Cain McKnight, BPM Global Investments, LLC, BPM Asset Management, LLC and others
Evans et al v. NexTech AR Solutions Corp.
as 1:2023mi00011
Plaintiff:
Jim Evans and Dave Franklin
Defendant:
NexTech AR Solutions Corp.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Justin McAusland, Derek Sims and Peter J. Woolverton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SIMS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE R. SIMS doing business as JRS STAFFING SERVICES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
JACQUELINE R. SIMS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE R. SIMS doing business as JRS STAFFING SERVICES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Brisco et al
as 2:2023mc00016
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, Yas Castellum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Marcus Todd Brisco et al
as 2:2023mc00018
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, Yas Castellum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
