Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Almeida-Goncalves v. Garland
as 21-60526
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Flaviane Almeida-Goncalves
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miranda Almeida v. Garland
as 21-1392
Petitioner:
ULISSES ALEXANDER MIRANDA ALMEIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
In Re: XP Inc. Securities Liti
as 21-903
Defendant:
Gabriel Klas da Rocha Leal, Guilherme Santana Monteiro da Silva, Julio Capua Ramos da Silva and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Itau BBA USA Securities, Inc., Jared Wilson, XP Investments US, LLC and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Swayam Prakash and Usha Prakash
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arceno and Joseph Acerno
Plaintiff / Appellant:
4F's Family, Inc. and 4Fs Family, Inc.
Almeida Michelena et al
as 1:2021cv20289
Petitioner:
Rober Frank Almeida Michelena, Eduardo Marcelo Almeida Michelena, Vicky Rocio Almeida Michelena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Almeida Michelena et al
as 1:2021mc20289
Petitioner:
Rober Frank Almeida Michelena, Eduardo Marcelo Almeida Michelena, Vicky Rocio Almeida Michelena and others
Respondent:
Law Firm Akerman LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
v. Almeida Michelena et al
as 1:2021cv20287
Defendant:
Daniela Lizzeth Almeida Arauz, Rober F Almeida Michelena, Eduardo M Almeida Michelena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Bruno Riebeiro De Almeida v. Attorney General United States
as 20-3531
Petitioner:
BRUNO RIEBEIRO DE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MAZAHREH et al v. GREWAL et al
as 1:2020cv17598
Defendant:
MARK P. TARANTINO, THOMAS BRYAN, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE & PISTOL CLUBS, INC., BILLY NUNES DE ALMEIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
