Cases 31 - 40 of 65
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GILES, ARTIS HOUSTON, HORACE COPELAND and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL FILMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc v. Sessa Capital (Master) LP et al
as 3:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc
Defendant:
Sessa Capital (Master) LP , Sessa Capital GP LLC , Sessa Capital IM LP and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Douglas A Kessler, Andrew Strong, Stefani D Carter and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Philip B Livingston , Sessa Capital (Master) LP , John E Petry and others
Counter_claimant:
Philip B Livingston , Sessa Capital (Master) LP , John E Petry and others
Counter_defendant:
Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Carter v. Curfman
as 3:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sandra D. Carter
Defendant:
Walter R. Curfman, Jr.
Movant:
Sabrina Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carter et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-15329
Plaintiff:
Luelda Ruth Carter and Gary D. Carter
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Mentor Worldwide LLC
United States of America v. Carter
as 4:2012mc00026
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Leon D Carter
Roberson et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00791
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roberson , Maria Alaniz , Yolanda Y. Alexander and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
USA v. Ronald D. Carter
as 12-1660
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD D. CARTER
Watson et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Marshall Watson , George E. Adams , Ira Adams and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc, BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
