Cases 31 - 40 of 3,095
USA v. O'Neil Gordon
as 24-10611
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
O'NEIL CLIFTON GORDON
Gordon P. Jones v. Cope-Land Touring, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Debtor:
North Florida Productions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Petitioner:
P.C. Liang
Defendant:
Cope-Land Touring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gordon Food Service, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09587
Plaintiff:
Gordon Food Service, Inc. and Glazier Foods Company
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (a/k/a Cargill Protein), JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Gordon Food Service, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Gordon Food Service, Inc. and Glazier Foods Company
Defendant:
Cargill Inc, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gordon-Kelly v. Tatum et al
as 6:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Mae Gordon-Kelly
Defendant:
Sheryl Tatum, Nicole Ellison, Belinda Haagsma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gordon Hoff, Sr. v. William M. Conley
as 24-1216
Petitioner:
GORDON O. HOFF, SR.
Respondent:
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
Peeples et al v. Campbell et al
as 4:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachel Campbell, David McCormick, James Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
North Florida Productions, LLC et al v. Beige Curtain, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Debtor:
North Florida Productions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Petitioner:
P. C. Liang
Defendant:
Beige Curtain, Inc. and Neon Trees, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. FaZe Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FaZe Holdings Inc., Angela Dalton, Mickie Rosen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
