Cases 31 - 40 of 290
United States of America v. Dupigny (Hubert Dupigny)
as 21-1656
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hensley Dupigny, AKA Dizzy, Christopher Bullock, AKA Cash, Dariel Braham, AKA Panama, AKA Corba and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Hubert Dupigny, AKA Fox
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Clark Thomas v. Charleston County
as 21-6646
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MARKLEY DENNIS, ORIN G. BRIGGS, I, SCARLETT A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK D. THOMAS, a/k/a George K. Nichols
Curtis Thornton v. City of Daly City, et al
as 21-15776
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK HENSLEY, Daly City Police Department Chief, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, PAUL MENDIARA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS THORNTON
Murray Hooper v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-70995
Respondent:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, WALTER HENSLEY, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and JEFFREY VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Florence Complex
Petitioner:
MURRAY HOOPER
Toby Lamb, II v. Brant Kendrick, et al
as 21-3390
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRANT KENDRICK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRITTANY MAXWELL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JUSTIN REECE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY LAMB, II
Charles Johnson, Jr. v. Nurse King, et al
as 21-1812
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Tefft, Sergeant B. Griffie, Nurse King, Miller County Detention Center ("MCDC") and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Gary Wall v. E. Rasnick
as 21-6553
Defendant / Appellee:
H. CLARKE, Director of VADOC, B. AKERS, Correctional Officer of R.O.S.P., L. BRYANT, Correctional Officer of R.O.S.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY WALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
