Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al. v. Stotts Mechanical Insulation, Inc. et al.
as 2:2013mc00003
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al.
Defendant:
Stotts Mechanical Insulation, Inc. et al.
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ASBESTOS WORKERS PENSION FUND v. IDEAL INSULATION, INC.
as 1:2012mc00009
Defendant:
IDEAL INSULATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ASBESTOS WORKERS PENSION FUND
Mountain State Mechanical Insulation, Inc. v. BELL Constructors, LLC
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Mountain State Mechanical Insulation, Inc.
Defendant:
BELL Constructors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
BROOKS v. BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. et al
as NJ/1:11-CV-05651
Defendant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC
Plaintiff:
BROOKS
Mumfrey v. Anco Insulation, Inc. et al
as LAE/2:11-CV-00711
Defendant:
Anco Insulation, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mumfrey
Los Angeles and Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council et al v. Palmdale Water District
as 2:2011cv02279
Plaintiff:
International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers Local 5, Los Angeles and Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, Salvador Romero and others
Defendant:
Palmdale Water District
RICHARDSON v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83630
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Victor Insulators, Inc. v. Diamond Packaging, Inc.
as 6:2010mc06047
Plaintiff:
Victor Insulators, Inc.
Defendant:
Diamond Packaging, Inc.
Victor Insulators, Inc. v. Diamond Packaging, Inc.
as 6:2010mc01047
Plaintiff:
Victor Insulators, Inc.
Defendant:
Diamond Packaging, Inc.
KERSTETER v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79779
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KERSTETER
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H.K. PORTER, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
