Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barton v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00630
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
LAWRENCE v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv02106
Defendant:
JOHN F. COZZI, JOHN E. DEAN, DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HENNEN v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01948
Defendant:
DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN M. MODANY
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER HENNEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ebony Howard v. ITT Federal Services Intl
as 14-6389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EBONY P. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT FEDERAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
JINDAL v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv01651
Defendant:
DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN M. MODANY
Plaintiff:
KUMUD JINDAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
TARAPARA v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01618
Defendant:
DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN M. MODANY
Plaintiff:
BABULAL TARAPARA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
BANES v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv01599
Plaintiff:
DAVID BANES
Defendant:
DANIEL FITZPATRICK, ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and KEVIN MODANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chism v. ITT Educational Services, Inc. d/b/a ITT Technical Institute
as 2:2014cv13574
Plaintiff:
Stacie Chism
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc. d/b/a ITT Technical Institute
Jordan v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 8:2014cv02531
Plaintiff:
Craig Jordan
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
