Cases 31 - 40 of 300
Shaw, et al v. Schulte, et al
as 21-3131
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BLAINE FRANKLIN SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class and SAMUEL JAMES SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BOSIRE, individually and on behalf of a class, MARK ERICH and SHAWNA MALONEY, individually and as the mother and natural guardian of minor D. M. minor M. M.
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUG SCHULTE, Master Trooper, in his individual capacity and BRANDON MCMILLAN, Technical Trooper, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
HERMAN JONES, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Kansas Highway Patrol
McMillan v. Chukwumerije
as 21-20313
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Khari Mott, Timothy Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John McMillan
F. H., et al v. West Morris Regional High Sch, et al
as 21-2028
Defendant / Appellee:
WEST MORRIS REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, COMMISSIONER ANGELICA ALLEN MCMILLAN, in her official and individual capacity, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. H., J. H. and F. H.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Latimer v. Regency Palms Apartment et al
as 8:2021cv01200
Plaintiff:
Calvin Latimer
Defendant:
Regency Palms Apartment and John E. McMillan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Charles McMillan
as 21-6256
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES MCMILLAN, a/k/a Cee Mack, a/k/a Mack, a/k/a Mack Hound
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 21-6239
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
