Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Owner-Operator Ind, et al v. Swift Trans Arizona, et al
as 2:2002cv01059
Plaintiff:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc , Gerald Webb and Wayne Bibicoff
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. (AZ)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10761
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION et al v. MAYFLOWER TRANSIT INC.
as 1:1998cv00457
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. CORWIN, SR., MARK DUDGEON, WILLIAM H. OWEN and others
Counter Claimant:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT INC.
Defendant:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT INC.
Counter Defendant:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION and ANNE WEBER-NEIDIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, In v. Ledar Transport, Inc. et al
as 4:2000cv00258
Plaintiff:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. , Daniel Day , David Horn and others
Defendant:
Ledar Transport, Inc. , Carl E. Higgs , Hawthorn Leasing, Inc. a/k/a Hawthorne Leasing, Inc. and others
Interested_party:
Truckload Carriers Association
Counter_claimant:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. , Hawthorn Leasing, Inc. a/k/a Hawthorne Leasing, Inc. and Ledar Transport, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. and Class Members
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Owner Operator Independent Dri, et al v. Comerica Bank
as 09-3463
Debtor:
In re: ARTIC EXPRESS INC. and D & A ASSOCIATES LTD
Appellant:
OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION INC, CARL HARP, as Representatives of the class and the Certified Class of Owner-Operators and MICHAEL WIESE, as Representatives of the class and the Certified Class of Owner-Operators
Appellee:
COMERICA BANK
Owner-Operator Ind Drivers, et al v. Ledar Transport, et al
as 08-1999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc., Daniel Day, David Horn and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ledar Transport, Inc., Carl E. Higgs, Hawthorn Leasing, Inc., also known as Hawthorne Leasing, Inc. and others
Owner-Operator Independent Dri, et al v. Mayflower Transit
as 08-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM H. OWEN, TIMOTHY CORWIN, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, INCORPORATED
Owner-Operator Independent Dri, et al v. Mayflower Transit
as 08-1300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM H. OWEN, TIMOTHY CORWIN, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, INCORPORATED
In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2007md01840
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., TravelCenters of America, LLC, Brown-Thompson General Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Cockrell, Jr., Dawn Lalor, Ruby Fowler and others
Interested Party:
NACS - The Association for Convenience & Petroleum Retailing, Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America, Miscellaneous Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association and others
Not Classified By Court:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), Bonnie Anderson, Melissa Holyoak and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of George A. Barton, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc. et al v. North American Van Lines Inc.
as 1:2007cv02637
Plaintiff:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc., Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc., Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc. and others
Defendant:
North American Van Lines Inc., North American Van Lines Inc., North American Van Lines Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Sierra Club et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2007cv02210
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Sierra Club, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Mary E. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
