Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Cheah et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as AZ/2:15-cv-01380
Plaintiff:
Jean Cheah , Randall Putman , Lee Dudley Blevins Separate Property Revocable Trust and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , SFPP LP , Kinder Morgan Operating LP D and others
Brown et al v. Skechers U.S.A. et al
as MOE/4:15-cv-00345
Defendant:
Skechers USA, Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Plaintiff:
Corey Brown , Doris Henderson-Lumpkins , Danielle Aultowski and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joe Taylor, et al v. City of Gadsden, et al
as 13-13885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE TAYLOR, JEFF MAYBEN, LECIL HARRELSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GADSDEN, AL, an Alabama Municipal corporation and SHERMAN GUYTON, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Gadsden
Putman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-02870
Plaintiff:
Gail Putman
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Trimble et al v. Putman
as 2:2012mc00058
Plaintiff:
Tony P Trimble , David M Angell and Barbara G Angell
Defendant:
James Putman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Taylor et al v. Gadsden, City of et al
as 4:2011cv03336
Plaintiff:
Joe Taylor , Jeff Mayben , Lecil Harrelson and others
Defendant:
Gadsden, City of and Sherman Guyton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Putman et al v. Delta Lloyds Insurance Company of Houston, Texas et al
as 3:2010cv00038
Defendant:
Delta Lloyd Insurance Company of Houston and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Scott Putman and Alison Putman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
