Cases 31 - 40 of 2,099
RATCHFORD et al v. GASELA, INC
as 1:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Alana Marie Souza, andra Cheri moreland, Dessie Pilek and others
Defendant:
GASELA, INC doing business as MI GRAN MARIACHI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Melara-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2187
Petitioner:
ERIC DANIEL MELARA-MARTINEZ, EVELYN CAROLINA RAMOS RUIZ, STEVEN MISAEL MARTINEZ RAMOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz-Romero v. Santiago-Colon
as 24-1333
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
PABLO SANTIAGO-COLON
Ruiz Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1805
Petitioner:
JULIA MARINA RUIZ RAMOS and CHELSEY YAHAIRA FELIPE RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diversified Distributors, Inc. v. Valley Girl Sales and Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Diversified Distributors, Inc.
Defendant:
Valley Girl Sales and Marketing, Inc., Yolanda Ramirez, Olson Maritza and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant:
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
Lopez et al v. Orange Lantern, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30035
Plaintiff:
Arianny Celeste Lopez, Abigail Ratchford, Andra Cheri Moreland and others
Defendant:
Orange Lantern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Vargas et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Martha Vargas and Raquel Ludim Ruiz
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and Secretary Antony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
USA v. Rey Rivera Ruiz
as 24-3034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rey Rivera Ruiz, also known as Gordo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
