Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Sadashiv Mares v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc.
as 17-80096
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SADASHIV MARES
Defendant - Respondent:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. (AZ)
Sciabacucchi v. Swift Transportation Company et al
as 2:2017cv01683
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sciabacucchi
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company, Richard H Dozer, Glenn Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TERRY v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
as 1:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
SEAN V. TERRY
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TERRY v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
as 1:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
SEAN V. TERRY
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Heffley, III v. Swift Transportation of AZ LLC
as 2:2015cv01273
Plaintiff:
Jack Authur Heffley, III
Defendant:
Swift Transportation of AZ LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
DinoDon Incorporated v. Daniel's Moving & Storage Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
DinoDon Incorporated
Defendant:
Daniel's Moving & Storage Incorporated , Swift Transportation Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Burnell, et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of AZ
as 13-56630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT SAUCILLO, JACK POLLOCK and JOHN BURNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Owner-Operator Independent Dri, et al v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc.
as 13-15851
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., FRANK BELCHER and MARC MAYFIELD
Defendant - Appellant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. (AZ)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08581
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
