Cases 41 - 50 of 931
USA v. Drayton
as 22-20303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Monte Drayton
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00820
Plaintiff:
Meadors, Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
US v. Montes
as 22-1402
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MONTES, a/k/a Jose Rivera, a/k/a Tuto
Antonio Montes Funez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-1800
Petitioner:
ANTONIO DELVIN MONTES FUNEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bednarz v. McDonough
as 22-1522
Claimant:
MONTE J. BEDNARZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Casa Libre Freedom House et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv01510
Plaintiff:
Casa Libre/Freedom House, El Rescate Legal Services Inc, LAITY UNITED FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE and others
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bravo Ramirez v. Garland
as 22-316
Petitioner:
ERICA BRAVO RAMIREZ, VALERIA LEYVA BRAVO, IGNACIO LEYVA BRAVO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Talamente et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00176
Plaintiff:
Talamente, Carlos Talamente and Martha Montes
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
SILVER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
MONTE SILVER and MONTE SILVER, LTD.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 IRS: Unauthorized Inspection or Disclosure of Returns and Return Information
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
