Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
American Sales Company, LLC v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00022
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., LTD and others
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Sales Company, LLC v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 3:2014cv00003
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Nexium Antitrust Litiga
as 13-8046
Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Respondent: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8044
Plaintiff - Respondent: ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8043
Plaintiff - Respondent: ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Salemi et al v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company et al
as 2:2013mc00511
Defendant: Mayne Pharma International, Warner Chilcott Laboratories Ireland, Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III and others
Petitioner: Dan Salemi
Plaintiff: HEB Grocery Company, Safeway, American Sales Company and others
Respondent: Marc Moscowitz, Cardinal Health 110, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae: Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
American Sales Company, LLC v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00347
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC
Defendant: Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Walgreen Co., et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15566
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
American Sales Company, LLC v. Astrazeneca AB et al
as 1:2012cv11711
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC
Defendant: Astrazeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astrazeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC v. WARNER CHILCOTT (US), LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04163
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: WARNER CHILCOTT (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?