Cases 41 - 50 of 58
PROTOSTORM, LLC et al v. ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP et al
as 1:2015mc00795
Plaintiff:
PROTOSTORM, LLC and PETER FAULISI
Defendant:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, FREDERICK D. BAILEY, CARL I. BRUNDIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Protostorm, LLC et al v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP et al
as 1:2015mc00016
Plaintiff:
Protostorm, LLC and Peter Faulisi
Defendant:
Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Frederick D. Bailey, Carl I. Brundidge and others
Protostorm, LLC et al v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP et al
as 8:2015mc00338
Plaintiff:
Protostorm, LLC and Peter Faulisi
Defendant:
Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Frederick D Bailey, Carl I Brundidge and others
Hurtado v. Holder, Jr.
as 14-1751
Petitioner:
CARLOS ANTONELLI HURTADO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Antonelli et al v. DJD Medical, Inc. et al
as MA/1:13-cv-11835
Plaintiff:
Anne Antonelli
Defendant:
DJD Medical, Inc. , Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., , Depuy International Limited and others
Candelaria v. The Corporate City of New York
as 13-1109
Petitioner:
Juan Candelaria
Respondent:
The Corporate City of New York, ("NYC"), Department of Corrections, ("DOC"), Martin F. Horn, Commissioner and others
Candelaria v. The Corporate City of New York
as 12-3680
Petitioner:
Juan Candelaria
Respondent:
The Corporate City of New York, ("NYC"), Department of Corrections, ("DOC"), Martin F. Horn, Commissioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ada Antonelli-Hurtado, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-1297
Petitioner:
ADA ARGENTINA ANTONELLI-HURTADO and MELVIN DANIEL CHINCHILLA-ANTONELLI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
