Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Waseem Daker v. Christopher Carr, et al
as 20-13067
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CARR, PATRICIA BETH ATTAWAY BURTON, JOSEPH DROLET and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
US v. Christopher Salisbury
as 20-7293
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SALISBURY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Christopher Brown
as 20-30612
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Brown
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Roderick Golden v. Brian Kemp, et al
as 20-12966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK A. GOLDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
TERENCE KILPATRICK, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CARR, BRIAN P. KEMP and others
United States v. Whitaker
as 20-7050
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WHITAKER, SR., AKA Unc
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Posey v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00543
Defendant:
Lucinda M. Baier, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., Steven E. Swain and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Posey, Sr.
Cary PetersonIn re: Cary Peterson
as 20-1585
Respondent:
SEC, MADELINE C. ARLEO, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DAY and others
Petitioner:
In re: CARY LEE PETERSON
Christopher DeanIn re: Christopher Dean
as 20-10680
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DEAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Ellington v. City of Mesa, et al
as 19-17467
Defendant:
LISA JOHNSON, named as Judge Lisa Johnson, T. SMITH, named as City of Mesa Police Officer T Smith, STEPHEN BRIDGER, named as City of Mesa Prosecutor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
P. CARROLL, named as Officer P. Carroll, JOHN MEZA, named as Chief John Meza, T. DANGERFIELD, named as Officer T. Dangerfield and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ELLINGTON, AKA Christopher M. Ellington
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Richard Jonathan Eden et al
as 2:2019cv09358
Defendant:
Christopher Michael Neumann and Richard Johnathan Eden
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
