Cases 41 - 50 of 982
Harris v. WLCC Lending FHC et al
as 1:2023cv03149
Defendant:
Raycen Raines, III, WLCC Lending FHC doing business as Fox Hills Cash, Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Apogee Coal Company, et al v. OWCP, et al
as 23-3437
Petitioner:
APOGEE COAL COMPANY, fka Arch of Kentucky, Inc. and ARCH COAL, INC.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD and MICHAEL G. CASH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanders v. Ray's Check Cashing et al
as 5:2023cv10779
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sanders
Defendant:
Ray's Check Cashing, Ray Jablonski, Sincere Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
US v. Arnel Hategekimana
as 23-4206
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARNEL HATEGEKIMANA, a/k/a Dominique Cash Robinson, a/k/a Homie
Filed in error
as 4:2023cv00879
Defendant:
Camille G. Cash, Camille G. Cash, M.D., P.A. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
