Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 641
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SNA CIGARS & HABERDASHERY LLC et al
as 2:2022cv06888
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant: SNA CIGARS & HABERDASHERY LLC doing business as SMOKE N ASHES, RYAN N. LUGO, CONWAY C. MARTINDALE II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae: The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner: Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01120
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02555
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Petitioner: Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, Joseph Cecile and others
Defendant / Appellant: Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, in his Official Capcity as Superintendent of the New York State Police, Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County and others
Petitioner: Gerard Gardner
Consumers' Research, et al v. Federal Communications Commission, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-13315
Petitioner: CONSUMERS' RESEARCH, CAUSE BASED COMMERCE, INC., EDWARD J. BLUM and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Bestwall, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022mc00164
Petitioner: The Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust, The Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust, The Flintkote Asbestos Trust and others
Respondent: Bestwall, LLC
Interested Party: Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood, PLC, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Matching Claimants and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?