Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Messer et al v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Vestal, William C. Church, David Estep and others
Defendant:
Garrison Investment Group, LP and Bristol Compressors International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Beranger et al v. Harris et al
as 1:2018cv05054
Plaintiff:
Petr Rasplicka, Jaroslav Trubac, Romero Hennep and others
Defendant:
Clifford "T.I." Joseph Harris, Jr. and Ryan Felton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown et al v. MDFI Inc et al
as 7:2017mc01618
Plaintiff:
David Brown , Dayletta Chaney , Rachel Chaney and others
Defendant:
MDFI Inc , Samuel J. Hamilton at York, LLC and Mar-Jac Poultry Inc
Miscellaneou:
Bankruptcy Clerk and Jennifer H Henderson
Powell v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Pamela Powell
Defendant:
Wanda Leigh Brown, C. David Brown, II, C. David Brown, II, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
David Resovsky, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80152
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DAVID RESOVSKY, GEORGE TODD, DAVID BROWN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria v. Ceiba Legal, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv03081
Plaintiff:
Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria
Defendant:
Ceiba Legal, LLP , Michael Hunter , Anthony Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: David Brown
as 3:2016gp00018
Hartman et al v Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as OKW/5:16-cv-00187
Plaintiff:
Franklin Hartman , Eddie Stallworth , Terry Kelley and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Corporation , McKesson Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
