Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Interactive Brokers LLC v. Rohit Saroop
as 19-1077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE SOFIS, PREYA SAROOP and ROHIT SAROOP
Savine v. Interactive Brokers, LLC
as 3:2018cv01846
Respondent:
Interactive Brokers, LLC
Petitioner:
Antoine Savine
Interactive Brokers LLC v. Mittal
as 8:2018cv01583
Plaintiff:
Interactive Brokers LLC
Defendant:
Ashok Mittal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00483
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rinaldi v. Interactive Brokers LLC
as 1:2017cv01434
Defendant:
Interactive Brokers LLC
Plaintiff:
Todd Rinaldi
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Interactive Brokers LLC v. Rohit Saroop
as 17-2154
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
ROHIT SAROOP, PREYA SAROOP and GEORGE SOFIS
United States of America v. 295,726.42 In Account Funds Seized from Interactive Brokers Account No. 6871 et al
as 8:2017cv00954
Defendant:
18,911.75 In Account Funds Seized From Citibank Account No. 0256 and 295,726.42 In Account Funds Sezied From Interactive Brokers Account No. 6871
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interactive Brokers LLC v. Saroop et al
as 3:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Interactive Brokers LLC
Defendant:
Rohit Saroop , Preya Saroop and George Sofis
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Global Ebusiness Services Inc et al v. Interactive Broker LLC
as 5:2015cv02354
Movant:
Syed Nazim Ali and Global Ebusiness Services Inc
Respondent:
Interactive Broker LLC
Spitzer Management, Inc., et al v. Interactive Brokers, LLC, et al
as 1:2013cv02184
Plaintiff:
Women's Right Information Center, Jerry Knapp Enterprises, Inc., KM Kole & Associates Corp. and others
Defendant:
Interactive Brokers, LLC, LNB Bancorp, Inc., Fifth Third Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
