Cases 41 - 50 of 57,662
Marquez v. Silver
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS MARQUEZ
Defendant:
LAUREN DESOLE, individually, GEORGE SILVER, individually, LAWRENCE MARKS, individually and others
United States of America v. Brosnan
as 24-3644
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN BROSNAN
Estate of Ian Simmers v. King County - State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3636
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF IAN SIMMERS, by and through administrator Donna Berube
Defendant:
KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, CITY OF BOTHELL, EDWARD J. HOPKINS, Detective and others
Rydeen v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
John Rydeen
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Poslajko v. Gritstone bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
John Poslajko
Defendant:
Gritstone bio, Inc., Andrew R. Allen and Vassiliki Economides
JERNIGAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
LARIS BRITTON JERNIGAN, XUAN THI TRAN and NHAN QUANG BAO TRAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SUSAN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SHEWMAKER et al v. YARDI SYSTEMS INC et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
BALACIANO GROUP, YARDI SYSTEMS INC, ALCO MANAGEMENT INC and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON SHEWMAKER and JAMAAR FAISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lawrence v. Kalm Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11493
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lawrence
Defendant:
Kalm Financial Inc., Cross Mortgage LLC, Amend Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: John Doe Juror Number Seven
as 2:2024cv01067
Not Yet Classified:
Juror John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
