Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Zuffa, LLC v. Lemaster et al
as 4:2011cv01481
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Jenell Lemaster and T J'S Hot Wings & Sports Lounge
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Douglas Mattern et al v. PushTraffic et al
as 2:2010cv09860
Plaintiff:
Grace Adele, Bette Anderson, James K. Blanscett and others
Defendant:
Bigjohnnews.com, Christopher Bosley, John Glen Denton and others
Paschal v. Lemaster et al
as 3:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Terrance T. Paschal
Defendant:
Michael J. Lemaster and International College of Broadcasting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Mitchell LeMaster
as 10-4480
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MITCHELL R. LEMASTER
Orville Moe, et al v. John Munding, et al
as 10-35999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORVILLE L. MOE, Creditor
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN DREAM ENTERPRISES, Creditor, TROY JAMES BURKE, Creditor, BRENDA COTHARY, Creditor and others
Trustee - Appellee:
JOHN D. MUNDING
Defendant:
SPOKANE RACEWAY PARK, INC., Debtor
Trustee:
US TRUSTEE
Newsome v. Lemaster et al
as 1:2010mc00041
Plaintiff:
Frank Newsome
Defendant:
Deputy Lemaster, Scott Thompson, Tonya Thompson and others
Mattern et al v. PushTraffic et al
as 3:2010cv02924
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mattern , Sandra Little , Clarence Forcier and others
Defendant:
PushTraffic, Incfortune, Dot Intel, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LEMASTER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00273
Petitioner:
JULIET R LEMASTER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
LeMaster v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2009cv01409
Plaintiff:
Edna LeMaster
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Alonzo Joins v. M Acuna et al
as 5:2009cv01662
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Joins
Defendant:
M Acuna, M Acuna, Orani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
